SK hynix reports 10 to 20 times throughput from 3D FeNAND compute-in-memory
The company says a jointly optimized 3D FeNAND architecture also achieved around 4,000 to 5,000 times greater energy efficiency than conventional 3D arrays under the same chip-area constraints. The work concerns a research result presented at IEEE IEDM 2025, not a commercial product launch. [f3, f19, f31]

Under the same chip-area constraints, SK hynix reports this throughput advantage over conventional 3D arrays.2
The company also reports this energy-efficiency advantage under the same chip-area constraints.2
The research was published in the IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.2
Story
How SK hynix combined memory-cell, circuit and data-layout changesCompared to conventional 3D arrays, SK hynix's optimized architecture for analog compute-in-memory using 3D FeNAND yielded a throughput that was about 10 to 20 times higher, according to the company.2 The comparison held chip area constant, while the reported energy-efficiency advantage was around 4,000 to 5,000 times.2 These are the company’s reported results for a research architecture, not figures describing a launched commercial product.2 The work was published in the 2025 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, and its authors were Won-Tae Koo and Jihun Kim, identified as Technical Leader, Global RTC, SK hynix.2 The size of the reported gains is tied to a combined design approach: the company attributes them to 3D FeNAND’s integration density and to reduced data movement.2
The problem the research addresses is the cost of repeatedly transferring data in expanding AI systems, where moving information can add both power use and delay.2 Compute-in-memory seeks to limit those transfers by carrying out processing within memory, or near it, rather than continually sending information to separate computing devices.2 In the analog form studied here, calculations take place inside memory using electrical states held in its cells.2 Those states support multiply-and-accumulate operations, a type of calculation used in AI computation.2 IT之家 likewise described A-CiM as performing such operations in memory through analog signals, and said reducing transfers can improve speed and energy efficiency.1
The storage challenge is linked to AI models’ use of weight data: SK hynix says large volumes must be stored and accessed again and again.2 That repeated access makes high-density memory important to the company’s account of A-CiM, because the weights need to reside in storage while being used for computation.2 Conventional commercial 3D NAND chiefly relies on charge trap nitride, a material layer that changes cell states by trapping or releasing electrons.2 SK hynix says this approach can provide density, but that advantage does not solve the difficulty of distinguishing the multiple current levels analog operations require.2 IT之家 also set out the contrast between conventional charge-trap nitride and FeNAND’s ferroelectric basis.1
FeNAND controls cell current through changes in a ferroelectric material’s electrical condition.2 That material can retain its polarization after the external electric field that changed it is no longer applied.2 SK hynix says these ferroelectric properties can make it easier to set several current levels accurately, while using less power than conventional 3D CTN NAND.2 The company also says a single FeNAND cell can produce multiple current states, a feature it considers appropriate for storing AI weight data.1 The proposed advantage is therefore not simply that FeNAND stores information differently, but that its current states may better serve analog computation.12
The paper does not treat a change to the memory cell as sufficient on its own.2 SK hynix points to power lost in interconnects and to inefficient use of pages as constraints that can hold back performance.2 Its research calls for improving control of cell current levels, the switching burden on word lines, and the way pages are used.2 Rather than presenting these as isolated fixes, the paper optimizes the cell, non-cell and page schemes together for 3D FeNAND-based A-CiM.2 This coordinated design is the basis for interpreting the reported performance comparison; the supplied account gives its numerical ranges for the same-area comparison, while IT之家 provides a qualitative explanation of A-CiM’s benefits.2
The page scheme concerns how computation data is laid out: the research arranges it into sequences and units intended to avoid needless switching.2 That data arrangement is one part of the wider optimization, alongside the memory-cell and non-cell schemes described in the paper.2 The company reports that applying the combined approach raised both computational throughput and energy efficiency in 3D FeNAND-based A-CiM.2 The reported comparison is against conventional 3D arrays and fixes chip area, so it describes performance under that stated area constraint rather than an unconstrained comparison.2 The throughput range and the energy-efficiency range measure different outcomes, and the supplied account reports both rather than treating one as a substitute for the other.2
The announcement is a research result, not a statement that a commercial product has been launched.2 SK hynix’s paper appeared at the 2025 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, while the supplied newsroom pages carry an October 14, 2026 publication date.2 The company's announcement of the research is therefore dated for the year after the conference where the paper was presented.2 Five further supplied newsroom pages display the same research headline and October 14, 2026 date, so those entries repeat the same publication information rather than establishing separate research results.2 IT之家 reported on October 15 that SK hynix had disclosed the research and that the work had appeared in an IEEE paper; the supplied account does not attach a year to that date.1
The company’s explanation connects the engineering choices to a broader demand: AI models require large stores of weights that are accessed repeatedly.2 In that setting, high-density storage matters because computation-in-memory depends on keeping data available within or near the memory where processing occurs.2 The study’s approach combines the density of three-dimensional FeNAND with changes intended to limit transfers, switching and page inefficiency.2 SK hynix reports improvements in throughput and energy efficiency from that combined design, while the supplied material does not describe a product launch.2 The result presented is thus a research comparison under a stated chip-area condition, with its reported benefits attributed to both memory integration and less data movement.2
Structure
Who is connected to whom- 1SK hynix
- ← competes withFact
- ← part ofFact
- partners with →Fact
- manufactures →Fact
- uses →Fact
History
How it came to this- 2025Research published at IEEE IEDMThe paper described joint optimization of cell, non-cell and page schemes for 3D FeNAND-based A-CiM.
- October 14, 2026SK hynix newsroom publicationSupplied newsroom pages carried the research headline and this publication date.
- October 15IT之家 reports on the researchIT之家 reported that SK hynix disclosed the 3D FeNAND A-CiM research and that the work appeared in an IEEE paper; the supplied fact does not specify the year.
- Nowabout 10 to 20 times Reported throughput improvement over conventional 3D arrays
Impact
Spreading outward, level by level- Level 1Architecture performance
SK hynix reports higher throughput and energy efficiency from holistic co-optimization, attributing the gains to 3D FeNAND integration density and reduced data movement.2
Fact - Level 2Memory and data organization
The reported approach jointly addresses cell current-level control, word-line switching overhead and page utilization; its page scheme arranges computation data to reduce unnecessary switching.2
Fact - Level 3AI computation
A-CiM carries out analog calculations inside memory using cell electrical states for multiply-and-accumulate operations, reducing the need to move data continually to separate compute devices.2
Fact - Level 4Product implications
The reported comparison describes a research architecture, not an announced commercial product launch.2
Fact
Sources
What each source supportsWritten by AI from the sources listed below: every fact was checked word for word against its source, and inference is marked apart. How we write